Searching...
Saturday, October 8, 2016

संविदा कर्मी भी मातृत्व अवकाश की हकदार

संविदा कर्मी भी मातृत्व अवकाश की हक़दार।
भेदभाव महिला के अधिकारों का उल्लंघन।


The Universal Declaration of Human Rights, adopted by the United Nations on 10th of December, 1948,
                               एवं
Convention on the Elimination of all forms of discrimination against women adopted by the United Nations on 18.12.1979

को आधार बनाया कोर्ट ने।

बागपत में तैनात अनुदेशिका की रिट पर हुआ आदेश

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD

Court No. - 7

Case :- WRIT - A No. - 18813 of 2016

Petitioner :- Manisha
Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 4 Others
Counsel for Petitioner :- Durga Tiwari
Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Rajesh Yadav

Hon'ble B. Amit Sthalekar,J.
Heard Smt. Durga Tiwari, learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri Rajesh Yadav, learned counsel for the respondent no.5 and Sri Mata Prasad, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel for the respondents no.1 to 4.
The petitioner in the writ petition is claiming maternity leave. According to her she applied for maternity leave w.e.f. 19.3.2016. In respect of her claim, the petitioner has submitted an application dated 1.2.2016, Annexure-4 to the writ petition, before the District Basic Education Officer, Baghpat through the Principal, Poorva Madhyamik Vidyalaya, Gurana, Baghpat, under receiving which has been forwarded by the Principal to the District Basic Education Officer, Baghpat. The learned counsel for the petitioner has placed reliance upon a Government order dated 22.12.2015, Annexure-7 to the writ petition, which is applicable in the case of honorary teachers, being paid honorarium of the post graduate colleges and submits that the petitioner is also entitled to maternity leave. A similar matter came up before the Supreme Court in the case of Municipal Corporation of Delhi Vs Female Workers reported in 2000 LawSuit (SC) 487 wherein the Supreme Court referring to Article 11 of the Convention on the Elimination of all forms of discrimination against women adopted by the United Nations on 18.12.1979 has held that the principles laid down in Article 11 thereof must be read into the contract of service of the women employees employed in the Municipal Corporation of Delhi. Paragraph 34 of the judgment reads as under:-
"Delhi is the capital of India. No other City or Corporation would be more conscious than the City of Delhi that India is a signatory to various International covenants and treaties. The Universal Declaration of Human Rights, adopted by the United Nations on 10th of December, 1948, set in motion the universal thinking that human rights are supreme and ought to be preserved at all costs. This was followed by a series of Conventions. On 18th of December, 1979, the United Nations adopted the "Convention on the Elimination of all forms of discrimination against women". Article 11 of this Convention provides as under:-
"Article 11
1. States Parties shall take all appropriate measures to eliminate discrimination against women in the field of employment in order to ensure, on a basis of equality of men and women, the same rights, in particular;
(a) The right to work as an inalienable right of all human beings;
(b) The right to the same employment opportunities, including the application of the same criteria for selection in matters of employment;
(c) The right to free choice of profession and employment, the right to promotion, job security and all benefits and conditions of service and the right to receive vocational training and retraining, including apprenticeships, advanced vocational train-ing and recurrent training;
(d) The right to equal remuneration, including benefits, and to equal treatment in respect of work of equal value, as well as equality of treatment in the evaluation of the quality of work;
(e) The right to social security, particularly in cases of retire-ment, unemployment, sickness, invalidity and old age and other incapacity to work, as well as the right to paid leave.
(f) The right to protection of health and to safety in working conditions, including the safeguarding of the function of repro-duction.
2. In order to prevent discrimination against women on the grounds of marriage or maternity and to ensure their effective right to work, States Parties shall take appropriate measures :
(a) To prohibit, subject to the imposition of sanctions, dismissal on the grounds of pregnancy or of maternity leave and discrimi-nation in dismissals on the basis of marital status;
(b) To introduce maternity leave with pay or with comparable social benefits without loss of former employment, seniority or social allowances;
(c) To encourage the provision of the necessary supporting social services to enable parents to combine family obligations with work responsibilities and participation in public life, in particular through promoting the establishment and develop-ment of a network of child-care facilities;
(d) To provide special protection to women during pregnancy in types of work proved to be harmful to them.
3. Protective legislation relating to matters covered in this article shall be reviewed periodically in the light of scientific and technological knowledge and shall be revised, repealed or extended as necessary."
It is not disputed that the conditions which are applicable to the contractual women employees would also be applicable in the case of the present petitioner and any act to the contrary would amount to discrimination against women employees.
In this view of the matter, this writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondent no.5-District Basic Education Officer, Baghpat to consider the claim of the petitioner for grant of maternity leave in accordance with law in the light of the observations made above within a period of one month from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this order in his office.
The petitioner shall also provide a copy of the application dated 1.2.2016 along with certified copy of this order to respondent no.5.
Order Date :- 27.4.2016
Kirti

इसी प्रकार के केस में लखनऊ बेंच का आदेश

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD, LUCKNOW BENCH

Court No. - 7

Case :- SERVICE SINGLE No. - 24601 of 2016

Petitioner :- Vineeta Singh And 11 Ors.
Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru Secy. Basic Edu.Lucknow And Others
Counsel for Petitioner :- Dhananjay Srivastava,Smt. Durga Tiwari
Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Prashant Arora,Shivam Sharma,Shobhit Kumar

Hon'ble Devendra Kumar Upadhyaya,J.
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, Shri Shobhit Kumar, learned counsel appearing for State Project Director, Sarva Shiksha Abhiyan, Lucknow, Shri Shivam Sharma, learned counsel appearing for District Basic Education Officer, Raebareli and learned Standing Counsel appearing for the State-respondents.
The petitioners are seeking appropriate direction to be issued to the respective District Basic Education Officers to take decision on the representation/application preferred by them for grant of maternity leave.
Accordingly, let decision on the application/representation moved by the petitioners be taken by the respective District Basic Education Officers forthwith i.e. within a fortnight from the date of production of certified copy of this order in accordance with law laid down by this Court in the case of Manisha vs. State of U.P. and others, Writ-A No.18813 of 2016.
To facilitate the decision to be taken by the concerned District Basic Education Officer on the application moved by the petitioners seeking grant of maternity leave, the petitioner shall also furnish a copy of the judgment and order dated 27.04.2016 passed by this Court in Manisha vs. State of U.P. and others, Writ-A No.18813 of 2016 along with certified copy of this order.
With the aforesaid observations and directions, the writ petition is finally disposed of.
Order Date :- 7.10.2016
akhilesh

संबन्धित खबरों के लिए क्लिक करें

GO-शासनादेश NEWS अनिवार्य सेवानिवृत्ति अनुकम्पा नियुक्ति अल्‍पसंख्‍यक कल्‍याण अवकाश आंगनबाड़ी आधार कार्ड आयकर आरक्षण आवास उच्च न्यायालय उच्‍च शिक्षा उच्चतम न्यायालय उत्तर प्रदेश उत्तराखण्ड उपभोक्‍ता संरक्षण एरियर एसीपी ऑनलाइन कर कर्मचारी भविष्य निधि EPF कामधेनु कारागार प्रशासन एवं सुधार कार्मिक कार्यवाही कृषि कैरियर कोर्टशाला कोषागार खाद्य एवं औषधि प्रशासन खाद्य एवम् रसद खेल गृह गोपनीय प्रविष्टि ग्रामीण अभियन्‍त्रण ग्राम्य विकास ग्रेच्युटी चतुर्थ श्रेणी चयन चिकित्सा चिकित्‍सा एवं स्वास्थ्य चिकित्सा प्रतिपूर्ति छात्रवृत्ति जनवरी जनसंख्‍या जनसुनवाई जनसूचना जनहित गारण्टी अधिनियम धर्मार्थ कार्य नकदीकरण नगर विकास निबन्‍धन नियमावली नियुक्ति नियोजन निर्वाचन निविदा नीति न्याय न्यायालय पंचायत चुनाव 2015 पंचायती राज पदोन्नति परती भूमि विकास परिवहन पर्यावरण पशुधन पिछड़ा वर्ग कल्‍याण पीएफ पुरस्कार पुलिस पेंशन प्रतिकूल प्रविष्टि प्रशासनिक सुधार प्रसूति प्राथमिक भर्ती 2012 प्रेरक प्रोन्‍नति प्रोबेशन बजट बर्खास्तगी बाट माप बेसिक शिक्षा बैकलाग बोनस भविष्य निधि भारत सरकार भाषा मकान किराया भत्‍ता मत्‍स्‍य मंहगाई भत्ता महिला एवं बाल विकास माध्यमिक शिक्षा मानदेय मानवाधिकार मान्यता मुख्‍यमंत्री कार्यालय युवा कल्याण राज्य कर्मचारी संयुक्त परिषद राज्य सम्पत्ति राष्ट्रीय एकीकरण रोक रोजगार लघु सिंचाई लोक निर्माण लोक सेवा आयोग वरिष्ठता विकलांग कल्याण वित्त विद्युत विविध विशेष भत्ता वेतन व्‍यवसायिक शिक्षा शिक्षा शिक्षा मित्र श्रम सचिवालय प्रशासन सत्यापन सत्र लाभ सत्रलाभ समन्वय समाज कल्याण समाजवादी पेंशन समारोह सर्किल दर संवर्ग संविदा संस्‍थागत वित्‍त सहकारिता सातवां वेतन आयोग सामान्य प्रशासन सार्वजनिक उद्यम सार्वजनिक वितरण प्रणाली सिंचाई सिंचाई एवं जल संसाधन सूक्ष्म लघु एवं मध्यम उद्यम सूचना सेवा निवृत्ति परिलाभ सेवा संघ सेवानिवृत्ति सेवायोजन सैनिक कल्‍याण स्टाम्प एवं रजिस्ट्रेशन स्थानांतरण होमगाडर्स