Searching...
Sunday, March 5, 2017

सियासी हुकुम पर तबादले न करे सरकार, हाईकोर्ट ने फिर लगाई एक बार फटकार : देखें कोर्ट आर्डर

सियासी हुकुम पर तबादले न करे सरकार,  हाईकोर्ट ने फिर लगाई एक बार फटकार।






उच्च न्यायालय की लखनऊ बेंच का फैसला

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD, LUCKNOW BENCH 
Court No. - 2 
Case :- SERVICE BENCH No. - 28772 of 2016 

Petitioner :- Virendra Kumar Tiwari 
Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Secy. Woman & Child Development & Ors. 
Counsel for Petitioner :- Manushresth Misra 
Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. 




Hon'ble Shri Narayan Shukla,J. 
Hon'ble Sheo Kumar Singh-I,J. 
Heard Mr.Ramesh Pandey, learned counsel for the petitioner as well as Mr.Amrendra Kumar Bajpai, learned counsel for the respondents. 
The petitioner has assailed the transfer order dated 21 November 2016 issued by the Special Secretary, Department of Women and Child Development of the State Government, whereby the petitioner while posted at Bal Vikas Pariyojna Adhikari at Balrampur has been transferred to Bulandshahar. 





The learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner's transfer is purely based on political dictate.� In support of his submission he has brought on record one letter dated 7 September 2016, written by the Hon'ble State Minister of Jantu Udyan Evam Chikitsa Swasthya, Prabhari Manti Lucknow/Ballia, even he is not concerned Minister of the Department, but he has recommended the petitioner's transfer being his activities against the political party. The Hon'ble Minister belongs to Samajwadi Party and he has observed petitioner's activities being against the policies of Samajwadi Party, therefore, he had recommended so. The other documents have been brought on record including one letter dated 16 November 2016 issued by the Director of the Department which has referred to the name of the complainant, in which the name of Dr.Shiv Pratap Yadav, Minister Jantu Udyan Evam Chikitsa Swasthya has been indicated, which establishes the connectivity of the petitioner's transfer with his dictate. 





Therefore, obviously the facts stated above establish that the petitioner's transfer is based on political consideration. Hence it definitely requires interference by this court. 
At this stage Mr.Bajpai, learned counsel for the respondents has invited the attention of this court towards paragraph 10 of the counter affidavit filed on behalf of respondents, in which it has been stated that:- 


"the petitioner was appointed in the year 1999 and has undergone 17 years of service on the post of Child Development Project Officer. In this tenure of service, he has spent 16 years in Devi Patan Division itself and within the said Division, 7 years of posting in district Balrampur......." 
Thus, it has been stated that the petitioner has enjoyed his service for seven years at Balrampur, whereas the transfer policy permits the posting of an employee for maximum 6 years in a district and ten years in a Division. Therefore, the political recommendation may not be the basis of transfer.




Regard being had to the aforesaid submissions, we are of the view that certainly the order of transfer impugned being based on political dictate requires interference by this court. Therefore, we hereby quash it. Simultaneously by noticing the facts narrated in the counter affidavit, as above, we issue direction to the respondents to post the petitioner at somewhere else forthwith, which may be issued simultaneously even alongwith the order cancelling his transfer order dated 21 November 2016, pursuant to this order. Any how the petitioner shall not be allowed to continue at Balrampur further. 




At the same time we would be failing in our duty if we do not take note of the recommendation of the Hon'ble State Minister to transfer the petitioner over which the State has acted upon without making any further inquiry of the allegations levelled against the petitioner. Therefore, we hereby advise the Government for future not to repeat such an order based on political dictate without making any further inquiry in the matter and having been found any material therefor. 
With the aforesaid observations and directions the writ petition stands disposed of finally. 



Order Date :- 3.3.2017 
Banswar 
(Sheo Kumar Singh-I,J.)  (Shri Narayan Shukla,J.) 

संबन्धित खबरों के लिए क्लिक करें

GO-शासनादेश NEWS अनिवार्य सेवानिवृत्ति अनुकम्पा नियुक्ति अल्‍पसंख्‍यक कल्‍याण अवकाश आंगनबाड़ी आधार कार्ड आयकर आरक्षण आवास उच्च न्यायालय उच्‍च शिक्षा उच्चतम न्यायालय उत्तर प्रदेश उत्तराखण्ड उपभोक्‍ता संरक्षण एरियर एसीपी ऑनलाइन कर कर्मचारी भविष्य निधि EPF कामधेनु कारागार प्रशासन एवं सुधार कार्मिक कार्यवाही कृषि कैरियर कोर्टशाला कोषागार खाद्य एवं औषधि प्रशासन खाद्य एवम् रसद खेल गृह गोपनीय प्रविष्टि ग्रामीण अभियन्‍त्रण ग्राम्य विकास ग्रेच्युटी चतुर्थ श्रेणी चयन चिकित्सा चिकित्‍सा एवं स्वास्थ्य चिकित्सा प्रतिपूर्ति छात्रवृत्ति जनवरी जनसंख्‍या जनसुनवाई जनसूचना जनहित गारण्टी अधिनियम धर्मार्थ कार्य नकदीकरण नगर विकास निबन्‍धन नियमावली नियुक्ति नियोजन निर्वाचन निविदा नीति न्याय न्यायालय पंचायत चुनाव 2015 पंचायती राज पदोन्नति परती भूमि विकास परिवहन पर्यावरण पशुधन पिछड़ा वर्ग कल्‍याण पीएफ पुरस्कार पुलिस पेंशन प्रतिकूल प्रविष्टि प्रशासनिक सुधार प्रसूति प्राथमिक भर्ती 2012 प्रेरक प्रोन्‍नति प्रोबेशन बजट बर्खास्तगी बाट माप बेसिक शिक्षा बैकलाग बोनस भविष्य निधि भारत सरकार भाषा मकान किराया भत्‍ता मत्‍स्‍य मंहगाई भत्ता महिला एवं बाल विकास माध्यमिक शिक्षा मानदेय मानवाधिकार मान्यता मुख्‍यमंत्री कार्यालय युवा कल्याण राज्य कर्मचारी संयुक्त परिषद राज्य सम्पत्ति राष्ट्रीय एकीकरण रोक रोजगार लघु सिंचाई लोक निर्माण लोक सेवा आयोग वरिष्ठता विकलांग कल्याण वित्त विद्युत विविध विशेष भत्ता वेतन व्‍यवसायिक शिक्षा शिक्षा शिक्षा मित्र श्रम सचिवालय प्रशासन सत्यापन सत्र लाभ सत्रलाभ समन्वय समाज कल्याण समाजवादी पेंशन समारोह सर्किल दर संवर्ग संविदा संस्‍थागत वित्‍त सहकारिता सातवां वेतन आयोग सामान्य प्रशासन सार्वजनिक उद्यम सार्वजनिक वितरण प्रणाली सिंचाई सिंचाई एवं जल संसाधन सूक्ष्म लघु एवं मध्यम उद्यम सूचना सेवा निवृत्ति परिलाभ सेवा संघ सेवानिवृत्ति सेवायोजन सैनिक कल्‍याण स्टाम्प एवं रजिस्ट्रेशन स्थानांतरण होमगाडर्स