Searching...
Friday, May 20, 2016

गाइड लाइन के खिलाफ हुआ तबादला अवैध नहीं

गाइड लाइन के खिलाफ हुआ तबादला अवैध नहीं।

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD

Court No. - 37

Case :- WRIT - A No. - 11089 of 2015

Petitioner :- Union Of India And 3 Others
Respondent :- C.A.T. Alld. Bench Allahabad And Another
Counsel for Petitioner :- Arnab Banerji
Counsel for Respondent :- S.C.,J.K. Mishra
Hon'ble Tarun Agarwala,J.
Hon'ble Prabhat Chandra Tripathi,J.
We have heard Sri Arnab Banerji, the learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri S.K.Singh, Advocate, holding brief of Sri J.K.Mishra, the learned counsel for the respondents.
The respondent is a railway employee and was posted for 17 long years at Fatehgarh. The petitioner transferred respondent No.2 to Mathura. The said respondent, being aggrieved, filed an original application before the Central Administrative Tribunal, which was allowed on the first date of hearing and the transfer order was quashed on the ground that it was violative of the policy dated 30.9.2009. The petitioner, being aggrieved by the said order, has filed the present writ petition in which an interim order was passed staying the operation of the Tribunal. As a result of the interim order the said respondent joined the place of transfer at Mathura and is still working there.
The bone of contention is, that the respondent's wife is a State Government employee and under the policy of the petitioner, dated 30.9.2009, husband and wife should be posted in the same station. Based on this clause (vii) of the policy dated 30.9.2009, the Tribunal quashed the order. For facility, the said clause is extracted hereunder:-
(2)
"(vii) Where one spouse is employed under the Central Govt. and the other spouse is employed under the State Govt.:-
The spouse employed under the Central Govt. may apply to the competent authority and the competent authority may post the said officer to the station or if there is no post in that station to the State where the other spouse is posted."
The aforesaid clause clearly indicates that the spouse who is employed in the Central Government may apply to the competent authority for his/her posting at the same station where the spouse is posted.
In the instant case the said respondent is a Central Government employee. The wife is posted at Fatehgarh. The said respondent was also posted at Fatehgarh, but was transferred to Mathura. The said respondent could apply for re-transfer back to Fatehgarh under Clause (vii) of the policy dated 30.9.2009. The Court is of the opinion that merely because the said respondent was transferred from Fatehgarh to Mathura in a routine course, does not mean that the said transfer is illegal and in violation of the policy. The Supreme Court in the case of Union of India and others vs. S.L.Abbas, AIR 1993 SC 2444 has held that the guidelines issued by the Government with regard to transfer of the employee does not create an enforceable right unless the transfer is malafide.
In State of U.P. and others vs. Gobardhan Lal, AIR 2004 (SC) 2165, the Supreme Court held that the transfer order could not be interfered even if it was violative of the guidelines.
In  the  light of the aforesaid, we are of the opinion, that the Tribunal committed a manifest
(3)
error in allowing the claim application on the first date of hearing without calling for a counter affidavit.
The impugned order cannot be sustained and is quashed. The writ petition is allowed. No useful purpose would be served in remitting the matter to the Tribunal concerned.
We are of the opinion that more than 2 years have elapsed since the date of the transfer of the respondents from Fatehgarh to Mathura. It will be open to the said respondent to apply for re-transfer back to the place where his spouse is posted. If such an application is filed, the authority will consider and pass appropriate orders in accordance with law.
Order Date :- 18.5.2016
AKJ

(Prabhat Chandra Tripathi,J.)
(Tarun Agarwala,J.)

संबन्धित खबरों के लिए क्लिक करें

GO-शासनादेश NEWS अनिवार्य सेवानिवृत्ति अनुकम्पा नियुक्ति अल्‍पसंख्‍यक कल्‍याण अवकाश आंगनबाड़ी आधार कार्ड आयकर आरक्षण आवास उच्च न्यायालय उच्‍च शिक्षा उच्चतम न्यायालय उत्तर प्रदेश उत्तराखण्ड उपभोक्‍ता संरक्षण एरियर एसीपी ऑनलाइन कर कर्मचारी भविष्य निधि EPF कामधेनु कारागार प्रशासन एवं सुधार कार्मिक कार्यवाही कृषि कैरियर कोर्टशाला कोषागार खाद्य एवं औषधि प्रशासन खाद्य एवम् रसद खेल गृह गोपनीय प्रविष्टि ग्रामीण अभियन्‍त्रण ग्राम्य विकास ग्रेच्युटी चतुर्थ श्रेणी चयन चिकित्सा चिकित्‍सा एवं स्वास्थ्य चिकित्सा प्रतिपूर्ति छात्रवृत्ति जनवरी जनसंख्‍या जनसुनवाई जनसूचना जनहित गारण्टी अधिनियम धर्मार्थ कार्य नकदीकरण नगर विकास निबन्‍धन नियमावली नियुक्ति नियोजन निर्वाचन निविदा नीति न्याय न्यायालय पंचायत चुनाव 2015 पंचायती राज पदोन्नति परती भूमि विकास परिवहन पर्यावरण पशुधन पिछड़ा वर्ग कल्‍याण पीएफ पुरस्कार पुलिस पेंशन प्रतिकूल प्रविष्टि प्रशासनिक सुधार प्रसूति प्राथमिक भर्ती 2012 प्रेरक प्रोन्‍नति प्रोबेशन बजट बर्खास्तगी बाट माप बेसिक शिक्षा बैकलाग बोनस भविष्य निधि भारत सरकार भाषा मकान किराया भत्‍ता मत्‍स्‍य मंहगाई भत्ता महिला एवं बाल विकास माध्यमिक शिक्षा मानदेय मानवाधिकार मान्यता मुख्‍यमंत्री कार्यालय युवा कल्याण राजस्व राज्य कर्मचारी संयुक्त परिषद राज्य सम्पत्ति राष्ट्रीय एकीकरण रोक रोजगार लघु सिंचाई लोक निर्माण लोक सेवा आयोग वरिष्ठता विकलांग कल्याण वित्त विद्युत विविध विशेष भत्ता वेतन व्‍यवसायिक शिक्षा शिक्षा शिक्षा मित्र श्रम सचिवालय प्रशासन सत्यापन सत्र लाभ सत्रलाभ समन्वय समाज कल्याण समाजवादी पेंशन समारोह सर्किल दर संवर्ग संविदा संस्‍थागत वित्‍त सहकारिता सातवां वेतन आयोग सामान्य प्रशासन सार्वजनिक उद्यम सार्वजनिक वितरण प्रणाली सिंचाई सिंचाई एवं जल संसाधन सूक्ष्म लघु एवं मध्यम उद्यम सूचना सेवा निवृत्ति परिलाभ सेवा संघ सेवानिवृत्ति सेवायोजन सैनिक कल्‍याण स्टाम्प एवं रजिस्ट्रेशन स्थानांतरण होमगाडर्स