Searching...
Saturday, April 9, 2016

प्रमुख सचिव बेसिक शिक्षा को अवमानना की नोटिस

OMR में सफेदा लगाने के प्रकरण में कोर्ट का आदेश

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT
ALLAHABAD
Court No. - 30
Case :- CONTEMPT APPLICATION (CIVIL)
No. - 1041 of 2016
Applicant :- Pratiksha Singh
Opposite Party :- Ashish Goyal, Principal
Secry., Basic Education
Counsel for Applicant :- Agnihotri Kumar
Tripathi,Anil Kumar Singh
Counsel for Opposite Party :- S.C.
Hon'ble Manoj Misra,J.
These contempt proceedings have been
initiated for violation of the direction
dated 08.10.2015 issued in Writ A No.
48620 of 2015 which reads as under:-
"This writ petition is therefore disposed of
at the admission stage itself with the
consent of learned counsel for the parties
with a direction to the respondent no.1,
Principal Secretary (Basic Education),
Shiksha, U.P. Lucknow to scrutinize and
examine all the OMR/Answer Sheets and
also identify those cases where it has
come on record that the result of even
those candidates have been declared who
have never appeared in the examinations.
This exercise shall be completed within a
period of four months from the date a
certified copy of this order is received in
his office."
The affidavit has been filed by Sri Ashish
Goyal, Principal Secretary (Basic
Education), Govt. of U.P., Lucknow stating
that pursuant to the direction given by
this Court, a meeting of high level officers
was called to ensure compliance and
pursuant to a decision taken in the
meeting, so held, a letter was sent to the
Managing Director, S.K. Printek Data
Create Solution, New Delhi for providing
original OMR Sheets of U.P. TET
Examination-2011 which returned back
with an endorsement that no such firm
exists. In the affidavit, inability has been
expressed to comply with the direction as
the original OMR Sheets were in the
custody of the firm. It has also been stated
that some OMR Sheets have been seized
and they are case property of Case Crime
No. 675 of 2011. In paragraph 14, it has
been stated that due to non-availability of
original OMR Sheets, compliance of the
order dated 08.10.2015 is not possible.
It is quite surprising that when the
bungling was of such a magnitude, instead
of sending a personal messenger to the
agency responsible for processing the
OMR Sheets and maintaining the record
was not approached directly but was
contacted only through a letter which
returned with an endorsement that no
such firm exists and, thereafter, what
efforts were made to trace out the firm
and its office-bearers are not disclosed.
Under the circumstances, this Court
considers it appropriate to direct the
opposite party to file an affidavit
disclosing what efforts were made to trace
out the partners of the firm and if those
firm partners were not traceable whether
any first information report was lodged
against them or not to ensure examination
of the original OMR Sheets, as directed by
this Court.
Let this matter be, therefore, listed on
03rd May, 2016, by which date, the
opposite party will file a better affidavit
disclosing the steps that were taken by
him to ensure compliance of the order
dated 08.10.2015.
Order Date :- 6.4.2016

क्या है मामला

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD 

Court No. - 7 
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 48620 of 2015 
Petitioner :- Sarita Shukla And 2 Others 
Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 6 Others 
Counsel for Petitioner :- Agnihotri Kumar Tripathi,Anil Singh Bishen 
Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C 

Hon'ble B. Amit Sthalekar,J. 
Supplementary affidavit filed today is taken on record. 

Heard Sri Radha Kant Ojha, learned Senior Counsel assisted by Sri Agnihotri Kumar Tripathi for the petitioners and Sri Mata Prasad, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel for the State-respondents. 
Petitioners are seeking quashing of the result dated 25.11.2011,30.11.2011 and 29.1.2015. Further prayer is for a direction to the respondents to decrease the marks of those candidates whose marks have been increased by six marks. 

It has been pointed out by the learned counsel for the petitioner that an enquiry in the matter regarding irregularities in the selection in question was ordered and an enquiry report has been submitted by the Chief Secretary dated 10.4.2012 in which wide scale irregularities have been reported.

With regard to marks it is submitted that in the report submitted by the Enquiry Committee headed by the Principal Secretary dated 10.4.2012 five questions in the Madhya Prathmik Star Pariksha, eight questions in the the Ucch Prathmik Star (Science) seven questions Ucch Prathmik Star (Arts) have been changed. It is also submitted that in the A series of the Prathmik as well as Ucch Prathmik Star question paper 11 questions have been changed. In para-11 of the report it is mentioned that six questions in the Prathmik Star Pariksha, eight questions in the Uchh Prathmik Star Pariksha, two questions in the Prathmik Star Pariksha (Urdu) are also wrong. 
In para 22-c of the writ petition it is alleged that in the result of the T.E.T. 2011 issued on 29.1.2015 there are candidates, whose names are mentioned in the list, who were not allotted any roll number. Their name has been shown who were about 1096 in number. In para 22-e a list of other candidates has been mentioned who have been shown Absent in the result declared on 25.11.2011 but their names have been shown as qualified in the TET Examination-2011. This list consists of about 68 names. 
This writ petition is therefore disposed of at the admission stage itself with the consent of learned counsel for the parties with a direction to the respondent no.1, Principal Secretary (Basic Education), Shiksha, U.P. Lucknow to scrutinize and examine all the OMR/Answer Sheets and also identify those cases where it has come on record that the result of even those candidates have been declared who have never appeared in the examinations. This exercise shall be completed within a period of four months from the date a certified copy of this order is received in his office.

Order Date :- 8.10.2015/Asha 

 


संबन्धित खबरों के लिए क्लिक करें

GO-शासनादेश NEWS अनिवार्य सेवानिवृत्ति अनुकम्पा नियुक्ति अल्‍पसंख्‍यक कल्‍याण अवकाश आंगनबाड़ी आधार कार्ड आयकर आरक्षण आवास उच्च न्यायालय उच्‍च शिक्षा उच्चतम न्यायालय उत्तर प्रदेश उत्तराखण्ड उपभोक्‍ता संरक्षण एरियर एसीपी ऑनलाइन कर कर्मचारी भविष्य निधि EPF कामधेनु कारागार प्रशासन एवं सुधार कार्मिक कार्यवाही कृषि कैरियर कोर्टशाला कोषागार खाद्य एवं औषधि प्रशासन खाद्य एवम् रसद खेल गृह गोपनीय प्रविष्टि ग्रामीण अभियन्‍त्रण ग्राम्य विकास ग्रेच्युटी चतुर्थ श्रेणी चयन चिकित्सा चिकित्‍सा एवं स्वास्थ्य चिकित्सा प्रतिपूर्ति छात्रवृत्ति जनवरी जनसंख्‍या जनसुनवाई जनसूचना जनहित गारण्टी अधिनियम धर्मार्थ कार्य नकदीकरण नगर विकास निबन्‍धन नियमावली नियुक्ति नियोजन निर्वाचन निविदा नीति न्याय न्यायालय पंचायत चुनाव 2015 पंचायती राज पदोन्नति परती भूमि विकास परिवहन पर्यावरण पशुधन पिछड़ा वर्ग कल्‍याण पीएफ पुरस्कार पुलिस पेंशन प्रतिकूल प्रविष्टि प्रशासनिक सुधार प्रसूति प्राथमिक भर्ती 2012 प्रेरक प्रोन्‍नति प्रोबेशन बजट बर्खास्तगी बाट माप बेसिक शिक्षा बैकलाग बोनस भविष्य निधि भारत सरकार भाषा मकान किराया भत्‍ता मत्‍स्‍य मंहगाई भत्ता महिला एवं बाल विकास माध्यमिक शिक्षा मानदेय मानवाधिकार मान्यता मुख्‍यमंत्री कार्यालय युवा कल्याण राजस्व राज्य कर्मचारी संयुक्त परिषद राज्य सम्पत्ति राष्ट्रीय एकीकरण रोक रोजगार लघु सिंचाई लोक निर्माण लोक सेवा आयोग वरिष्ठता विकलांग कल्याण वित्त विद्युत विविध विशेष भत्ता वेतन व्‍यवसायिक शिक्षा शिक्षा शिक्षा मित्र श्रम सचिवालय प्रशासन सत्यापन सत्र लाभ सत्रलाभ समन्वय समाज कल्याण समाजवादी पेंशन समारोह सर्किल दर संवर्ग संविदा संस्‍थागत वित्‍त सहकारिता सातवां वेतन आयोग सामान्य प्रशासन सार्वजनिक उद्यम सार्वजनिक वितरण प्रणाली सिंचाई सिंचाई एवं जल संसाधन सूक्ष्म लघु एवं मध्यम उद्यम सूचना सेवा निवृत्ति परिलाभ सेवा संघ सेवानिवृत्ति सेवायोजन सैनिक कल्‍याण स्टाम्प एवं रजिस्ट्रेशन स्थानांतरण होमगाडर्स